Skip to content

Conversation

@alexeyzimarev
Copy link
Contributor

@alexeyzimarev alexeyzimarev commented Nov 14, 2025

PR Type

Documentation


Description

  • Added comprehensive AI agent context document for Eventuous

  • Covers repository structure, core concepts, and architecture patterns

  • Includes development practices, common workflows, and key packages

  • Provides important notes and resources for AI agents working with codebase


Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["agents.md<br/>Documentation"] --> B["Repository<br/>Overview"]
  A --> C["Project<br/>Structure"]
  A --> D["Core<br/>Concepts"]
  A --> E["Development<br/>Practices"]
  D --> F["Aggregates"]
  D --> G["Command<br/>Services"]
  D --> H["Event Store<br/>Abstractions"]
  E --> I["Testing &<br/>Building"]
  E --> J["Contributing<br/>Guidelines"]
Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Documentation
agents.md
Comprehensive AI agent context documentation                         

agents.md

  • Created new comprehensive documentation file for AI agents working
    with Eventuous
  • Documented repository structure with detailed component organization
  • Explained core concepts including Aggregates, State, Command Services
    (both aggregate-based and functional), Event Store abstractions,
    Subscriptions, Producers, and Gateway
  • Listed all key NuGet packages with their purposes
  • Outlined development practices, code style, testing approaches, and
    contribution guidelines
  • Provided architecture patterns overview covering Event Sourcing, CQRS,
    and Domain-Driven Design
  • Included common workflows for creating aggregates, command services,
    event handlers, and subscriptions
  • Added important notes for AI agents regarding breaking changes,
    deprecated APIs, stream naming, type mapping, and testing frameworks
  • Provided file naming conventions and related resources
+346/-0 

@qodo-free-for-open-source-projects
Copy link
Contributor

qodo-free-for-open-source-projects bot commented Nov 14, 2025

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

(Compliance updated until commit 73d356a)

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢
No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
🎫 No ticket provided
  • Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
🟢
No codebase code duplication found No new components were introduced in the PR code
Custom Compliance
🟢
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails

Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code

Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management

Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Error Handling

Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Logging Practices

Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling

Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Compliance status legend 🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

Previous compliance checks

Compliance check up to commit da632cf
Security Compliance
🟢
No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
🎫 No ticket provided
  • Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
🟢
No codebase code duplication found No new components were introduced in the PR code
Custom Compliance
🟢
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails

Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code

Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management

Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Error Handling

Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Logging Practices

Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling

Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

@qodo-free-for-open-source-projects
Copy link
Contributor

qodo-free-for-open-source-projects bot commented Nov 14, 2025

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
High-level
Automate context file generation

The manually created agents.md file will quickly become outdated. It is
recommended to create a script that automatically generates this file by
introspecting the source code to ensure the context provided to AI agents
remains accurate.

Examples:

agents.md [1-346]
# Eventuous - AI Agent Context

## Repository Overview

**Eventuous** is a production-grade Event Sourcing library for .NET that provides abstractions and implementations for building event-sourced systems following Domain-Driven Design (DDD) tactical patterns.

- **Primary Language:** C#
- **Target Frameworks:** .NET 10, 9, and 8
- **License:** Apache 2.0
- **Copyright:** Eventuous HQ OÜ

 ... (clipped 336 lines)

Solution Walkthrough:

Before:

# agents.md (Manual creation)

# Eventuous - AI Agent Context

## Project Structure
eventuous/
├── src/
│   ├── Core/
│   │   ├── src/
│   │   │   ├── Eventuous.Domain/
... (content is manually written and maintained)

## Core Concepts
### 1. Aggregates
**Location:** `src/Core/src/Eventuous.Domain/Aggregate.cs`
```csharp
public abstract class Aggregate<T> where T : State<T>, new()



#### After:
```markdown
# build_context_script.py (Conceptual)

def get_project_structure():
    # Use `tree` or `os.walk` to generate directory listing
    return ...

def get_core_concepts():
    # Use AST parsing or regex on source files
    # to find key classes like 'Aggregate' and get their signatures.
    return ...

def generate_markdown_file():
    structure = get_project_structure()
    concepts = get_core_concepts()
    # ... gather other info automatically

    # Render a template with the collected data
    render_template("agents.md.jinja", structure, concepts)

generate_markdown_file()

Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

__

Why: The suggestion correctly identifies the critical long-term maintenance burden of a manual agents.md file and proposes a robust automated solution, which is essential for keeping the AI context accurate and reliable.

High
General
Correct the PostgreSQL package name

Correct the PostgreSQL package name from Eventuous.Postgresql to
Eventuous.Postgres in the "Key Packages" table for consistency with the project
structure.

agents.md [201-202]

-| `Eventuous.Postgresql`                | PostgreSQL support                    |
+| `Eventuous.Postgres`                  | PostgreSQL support                    |
 | `Eventuous.SqlServer`                 | SQL Server support                    |
  • Apply / Chat
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

__

Why: The suggestion correctly identifies and fixes an inconsistency between the project structure diagram (line 32) and the package list regarding the PostgreSQL package name, improving the document's accuracy.

Low
  • Update

@alexeyzimarev alexeyzimarev merged commit a8ce44a into dev Nov 14, 2025
4 checks passed
@alexeyzimarev alexeyzimarev deleted the agents-md branch November 14, 2025 11:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants